John Jay Papers
Documents filtered by: Author="Jay, Sarah Livingston" AND Recipient="Jay, John" AND Period="Washington Presidency"
sorted by: editorial placement
Permanent link for this document:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jay/01-05-02-0226

To John Jay from Sarah Livingston Jay, 10[–12] June 1792

From Sarah Livingston Jay

New York 10th.[–12] June 1792—

My Dear Mr. Jay,

On friday myself & the children had the pleasure of receiving your kind letters of the last of May and first of June,1 since which I hope you have recd. two packets from me sent to Judge Marchant’s care by Captn. Peterson & Captn. Cahoon— I intended ^to^ send this by to-morrow’s post, but I have just heard that Captn. Peterson is again to sail out Tuesday, so that I think it best to postpone it till then, as I can then send you the papers & give you decisive accounts relative to the election. At present the issue of it is doubtful, rendered so by a quibble— if the suffrages of the people are admitted, they give you a majority of 400 votes, but if the County of Otsego are to lose theirs, Clinton will have the majority of a ^small^ number— Yesterday was published in Childs’s paper the opinion of 8 of the principal Lawyers of the City in favor of the legality of the return of the votes.2 I will send you the Gazettes that contain the discussions on that question— to-morrow I am informed are to be published the opinions of 8 or 9 on the other side & to be signed by them.3 Oh, how is the name of Livingston to be disgraced! Brockholst, Edward, William, S. Maturin, &c. are to be of the number— those shameless men, blinded by malice ambition & interest have conducted themselves with such indecency during the election & daily since the canvassing of the votes, as to open the eyes of every one respecting their views in their opposition to you— It is said, & I believe it, that Brockholst and Ned first suggested the doubts on that subject— The Canvassers of the votes are eleven, eight of whom are partizans of Clinton, & three are in favor of you— In order, as is supposed, to Cloak themselves, they Officially asked the opinion of Burr & King4— their Opinions have not yet been printed, but I am informed by good Authority that King’s is decidedly in favor of the old sheriff’s being entitled to act, until a new sheriff was commissioned to succeed. Mr. Burr (as was supposed) was too sore to be unbiassed; he has, therefore, delivered an Opinion which like a two-edged sword, cuts both ways; for he declares that there was no sheriff; which, if admitted, destroys the legality of the votes & casts an Odium on the Governor for suffering so important an Office to be vacant— Should the Canvassers be hardy enough to decide against the privileges of the People, & instead of suffering them to choose a Governor, take upon themselves to give them one, it will occasion great agitation throughout the State. I am satisfyed that the sentiments of the people are with you— whether you are or are not Governor, it appears that you are the choice of the people.—

Munro & his Wife return’d from Rye last evening; they left your brother & his Wife & our son & Essex well.

I was pleased to find that, prior to the receipt of your letter, I had exactly pursued the line of conduct you suppose to be the most proper on a late unpleasant occasion. I find from Munro that your brother will readily concur with you, as both himself & Mrs. Jay disappoved with the Union— I wrote you that I had visited Mrs. Jay— she has not returned the visit, but I shall not complain of it.—

Monday Evening—

Well! my dear Mr. Jay the Canvassers have taken upon them to give the people a Governor of their election not the one the people preferred— When Governor Clinton was 108 votes ahead, it was thought dangerous to examine the vote of Tioga County, it being reduced to a certainty that that County alone wd. give you a majority independant of the votes of Otsego, another quibble was therefore invented, & they were likewise set aside— I am informed that the Recorder, Isaac Roosevelt, & Mr. Ganzevort are determined to enter their protest, & likewise to publish the votes of those counties which they think illegally thrown aside; & which if admitted would have given you a majority of a thousand votes—

The dejection, uneasiness & dissatisfaction that prevails, casts the darkest Odium upon our shameless Governor, while it makes your light shine still brighter than ever— One of the Clintonians told a gentleman of our acquaintance that he was now convinced of the necessity of a change.— Judge Hobart came last evening to Congratulate me on your triumph; I told him I really conceived it such— Peter Munro is writing to you & has promised to collect those papers which are most interesting— the hand bill enclosed is Duer’s, but I think it best to conceal the Author’s name—5 those lawyers who had boasted their design of publishing their opinions against the votes have taken care not to fulfil their promise.

Since you have so honorably lost your election, I could acquiesce in it with pleasure, did it not deprive me of the pleasure of seeing you soon & of enjoying your company for a great part of the year— but I will not dwell upon one disagreeable circumstance when so many agreeable ones concur to make me happy— Oh my dear Mr. Jay! What transport does it give me to hear the praises that are daily bestowed upon you— Much rather would I lose a Crown as you have lost the Office contended for, than gain an empire upon the terms Governor Clinton steals into his—

Tuesday Morng. I find they have not yet announced in the paper the appointment of Governor— I am told that it is intended that it shd. be accompanied with the protests of Jones, &c.— there is such an ferment in the City that it is difficult to say what will be the consequences. I shall leave my letter unsealed until evening shd. anything occur in the interval that is interesting you shall be apprised of it. I am sitting in your room to write & at your table & have almost persuaded myself that I am making my communications verbally.

People are running in continually to vent their vexation— Poor Jacob Morris looks quite disconsolate— King says he thinks Clinton as lawfully Governor of Connecticut as of New York, but he knows of no redress—

Captn. Peterson is ready to sail as soon as the wind changes. I think it best therefore to close this letter & send it; I can again write to-morrow as that is Post-day if there is any thing worth writing— We are all well, & had been delighting ourselves with the prospect of seeing you soon. The Children therefore when they heard of the decision of the Canvassers exclaimed Oh! Mama then we shall not see Papa this great while— My only consolation is, that time has wings, & altho’ they will appear to me to be clogg’d, yet they will finally waft you back to us— Till then my best beloved farewell!

S. Jay

Tuesday June 12th. 1792

ALS, NNC (EJ: 06552).

1Letters not found.

2For the statement of the pro-Jay lawyers, see Daily Advertiser (New York), 9 June.

3As noted below no such statement appeared at the time. For later statements by the pro-Clinton lawyers, see Impartial Statement of the Controversy description begins An Impartial Statement of the Controversy Respecting the Decision of the late Committee of Canvassers (New York, 1792; Early Am. Imprints, series 1, no. 24421) description ends , 24–44.

4For the statements of Burr and King, see Daily Advertiser, 18 June.

5Neither PJM’s letter nor the enclosure have been found. Duer’s broadside has not been identified. However, some Clintonian polemicists attributed pieces signed “Gracchus”, as well as later pieces signed “Brutus” to Duer, by name or by references to his bankruptcy and imprisonment for debt. “Brutus” denied the attribution for writings under that name. See Troup to JJ, 10 June, and note 3, above; “A Friend to Order”, New-York Journal, 16 June; the Federal Gazette (Philadelphia), 19 June; “Fair Play”, New-York Daily Gazette, 19 June; “Julius Caesar”, New-York Journal, 23 June and 4 July; “Americanus”, New-York Journal, 27 June; Daily Advertiser, 29 June; “Brutus”, the Diary, 19 June, and New-York Journal, 23 June, 30 June; “Legion”, New-York Journal, 14 July, and the Diary, 17 July; “Brutus,” “To the People,” 18 June 1792 (Early Am. Imprints description begins Early American Imprints, series 1: Evans, 1639–1800 [microform; digital collection], edited by American Antiquarian Society, published by Readex, a division of Newsbank, Inc. Accessed: Columbia University, New York, N.Y., 2006–16, http://infoweb.newsbank.com/; Early American Imprints, series 2: Shaw-Shoemaker, 1801–1819 [microform; digital collection], edited by American Antiquarian Society, published by Readex, a division of Newsbank, Inc. Accessed: Columbia University, New York, N.Y., 2006–16, http://infoweb.newsbank.com/ description ends , no. 46588).

Index Entries