You
have
selected
Recipient
Sort: Frequency / Alphabetical
Show: Top 0
Period
Dates From
Dates To
| No. | Author | Recipient | Title | Date | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. IV, [1 August 1795] | 1795-08-01 | An accurate enumeration of the breaches of the Treaty of peace on our part would require a... | |
| 2 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. V, [5 August 1795] | 1795-08-05 | The discussion in the two last numbers has shewn if I mistake not, that this Country by no means... | |
| 3 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. VI, [8 August 1795] | 1795-08-08 | There is one more objection to the Treaty for what it does not do, which requires to be noticed.... | |
| 4 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. VII, [12 August 1795] | 1795-08-12 | The Second Article of the Treaty stipulates that his Britannic Majesty will withdraw all his... | |
| 5 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. VIII, [15 August 1795], with enclosure | 1795-08-15 | One of the particulars in which our Envoy is alleged to have fallen short of what might and ought... | |
| 6 | “Camillus“ | The Defence No. IX, [21 August 1795] | 1795-08-21 | It was my intention to have comprised in two numbers the examination of the second article; but... | |
| 7 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. X, [26 August 1795] | 1795-08-26 | The object of the third article is connected with that of the second. The surrender of the posts... | |
| 8 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XI, [28 August 1795] | 1795-08-28 | The foregoing analysis of the third article, by fixing its true meaning, enables us to detect... | |
| 9 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XII, [2–3 September 1795] | 1795-09-03 | The remaining allegations in disparagement of the 3 article are to this effect 1 That the... | |
| 10 | “Camillus” | The Defence No. XIII, [5 September 1795] | 1795-09-05 | The 4th and 5th articles of the Treaty from similarity of object will naturally be considered... |