George Washington Papers

To George Washington from Richard Kidder Meade, 21 December 1796

From Richard Kidder Meade

Frederick [Va.] 21st Decr 1796

Dear Sir

It is with reluctance that I contribute in the least degree to the accumulation of your trouble; but when the object of this letter, & my motive for writing it, is known to you, I will not doubt of gaining your pardon, for the trouble it may cause. I am certain you hold in remembrance the name of Colo. Robert Stark, the gentleman who met with such rigorous & continued ill treatment to the Southward during his captivity with the British. From a state of affluence, at least of compleat independance, he was reduced to seek his fortune in the Spanish Government, & settled with the remnant of his property at the Natches1—disgusted with so arbitrary a Government2 & possessing a temper incapable of flattery, by which he might have preserv’d a good understanding with the Governor & by that means have promoted his interest, he determind unfortunately, just before the treaty with Spain, to return to his native State with the very little he had left; he is however still anxious to go back from the favorable boundary establish to the South,3 & his attachment to that Country, & has solicited me in such a manner, to give you the trouble of reading this, that I was unable to get over it. He informs me that the establishment of a new State South West of the Tenessee will be before Congress during their present sitting,4 & that he should be glad to fill any office, in such State, as he may be thought qualified for; he also mentions that he has written to some members of Congress of his acquaintance on the subject,5 to them I beg leave to refer you as being better acquainted with him than I am; but Sir, although I am well aware of the Serious business of recommendation, I think myself bound as I have undertaken this task, to say that he appeard to me during a visit he made me, to be an open candid & firm man of good plain understanding, & that his politics correspond perfectly with the sentiments you express’d publicly to your Country,6 I would to God we could all imbibe the same opinions. Pardon me for going a little further. There can be no doubt that you get good general information of what passes in the union, yet it may not be amiss to communicate to you that Mr Stark (immediately arriv’d) speaks of a dangerous French character in the Country he has left, an agent of Genets on a former occasion, who is endeavouring to poison the minds of the people, by disaffecting them to the United States & attaching them to france, but as a consolation he further adds that the few inhabitants there by no means incline to a french connection.7 I will only present Mrs Meades8 & my own best respects to Mrs Washington & yourself & beg you to be assurd, that I am with every proper sentiment towards you—your anxious fellow citizen friend & hum. Servt

R. K. Meade

ALS, DLC:GW. No reply to Meade from GW has been found.

1Robert Stark (Starke) (1740–1806), a native of Virginia, later moved to South Carolina, where he became sheriff of Ninety-Six District in 1772. In the early part of the Revolutionary War, Stark served as colonel of a South Carolina militia regiment. Following the American surrender at Charleston, S.C., in May 1780, Stark was imprisoned in the city’s British Provost, located underneath the Exchange. He did not gain his release until March 1782. While detained, Stark reportedly was treated inhumanely. On 19 Dec. 1781, he complained to Maj. Gen. Nathanael Greene of his confinement “in a Dungeon” and of the distress of his large family (Greene Papers description begins Richard K. Showman et al., eds. The Papers of General Nathanael Greene. 13 vols. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1976–2005. description ends , 10:80). Stark’s exchange was delayed due to allegations that he had “put to death … some atrocious criminals contrary to the Enemy’s Proclamations” (Greene Papers description begins Richard K. Showman et al., eds. The Papers of General Nathanael Greene. 13 vols. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1976–2005. description ends , 9:440; 10:466). Around the winter of 1790–91, Stark settled at Natchez in West Florida (later Mississippi Territory), where he served in the early 1800s as clerk to the Supreme Court and to other territorial courts. Stark died in Winchester, Virginia.

2The period of Spanish rule of the Natchez district (1779–1798), then part of West Florida, was marked by the imposition of martial law and the abolishment of representative government and jury trials. Governors, or commandants appointed by the governors-general of Louisiana and West Florida, had civil and military authority in the Natchez region. They personally issued edicts and often decided civil and criminal cases (see Busbee, Mississippi description begins Westley F. Busbee, Jr. Mississippi: A History. 2d ed. Chichester, England, 2015. description ends , 47–48).

3The U.S.-Spanish Treaty of San Lorenzo, signed on 27 Oct. 1795, and ratified by the United States on 7 March 1796, gave U.S. citizens free navigation of the Mississippi River and defined the southern and western boundaries between the United States and Spanish territories. Article II of the treaty stipulated that the southern boundary of the United States would be “designated by a line beginning on the River Mississipi at the Northermost part of the thirty first degree of latitude North of the Equator, which from thence shall be drawn due East …” (Miller, Treaties description begins Hunter Miller, ed. Treaties and Other International Acts of the United States of America. Vol. 2, 1776-1818. Washington, D.C., 1931. description ends , 318–45; see also GW to the U.S. Senate, 29 March 1796).

In 1793, two years before the Treaty of San Lorenzo was finalized, Stark had considered leaving Spanish-ruled Natchez to return to the United States. In a letter dated 6 Aug. 1793 at Natchez, Manuel Gayoso de Lemos, then-governor of the District of Natchez, informed Francisco Luis Hector, Baron de Carondelet, the Spanish governor of Louisiana, that Stark and his family “began to show great uneasiness” following Creek Indian raids in the region, and that he and his family wished to sell their land and return to the United States. Having prohibited Stark from selling his land because it had been granted for settlement purposes only, Gayoso recommended that Stark be given permission to leave the territory (D. C. and Roberta Corbitt, eds., “Papers From the Spanish Archives Relating to Tennessee and the Old Southwest,” The East Tennessee Historical Society’s Publications 34 [1962]: 99–100). Stark had no formal title to his land. In 1794, a financially ruined Stark was briefly imprisoned for disloyalty to Spanish authorities (see Terry Alford, Prince Among Slaves [New York and London, 1977], 53–54).

4Congressional records for the last three months of GW’s presidency are silent concerning the admission of a new state into the Union southwest of Tennessee. Mississippi became a state in 1817, and Louisiana and Arkansas were admitted to the Union in 1812 and 1836, respectively.

5No letters from Stark to members of Congress have been identified.

6Meade most likely refers to the political statements expounded in GW’s Farewell Address of 19 September.

7Georges-Henri-Victor Collot, along with Charles-Joseph Warin and Thomas Power, was charged by French minister Pierre-Auguste Adet in early 1796 with a secret scouting mission to the Ohio and Mississippi valleys. Their mission sought to obtain information about American military outposts and to effect French repossession of Louisiana and extend its boundary to the Allegheny Mountains. They were also tasked with persuading inhabitants of the western and southern territories and states, such as Kentucky, to secede from the United States and to ultimately come under French rule. The French anticipated that control of Louisiana, and hence of the Mississippi River, would alienate western settlers from U.S. jurisdiction and influence. Collot embarked on the mission in March 1796, and after stopping in Pittsburgh, St. Louis, New Orleans, and other cities, he returned to Philadelphia in December 1796. Though Collot and his fellow emissaries were instructed to try to influence the presidential election in favor of Thomas Jefferson, the ultimate plot failed (see James McHenry to GW, 13 May; see also Statement of Oliver Wolcott, Jr., 19 May; Charles Lee to GW, 20 May; McHenry to GW, 2 July; and McHenry to GW, 10 July and 10 Oct. [second letter]; see also Durand Echeverria, trans., “General Collot’s Plan for a Reconnaissance of the Ohio and Mississippi Valleys, 1796,” WMQ description begins The William and Mary Quarterly: A Magazine of Early American History. Williamsburg, Va. description ends , 3d ser., 9 [1952], 512–20). For one instance of a report of Collot’s activities on the frontier, see Anthony Wayne to McHenry, 29 Aug. 1796, in Knopf, Wayne description begins Richard C. Knopf, ed. Anthony Wayne, a Name in Arms: Soldier, Diplomat, Defender of Expansion Westward of a Nation; The Wayne-Knox-Pickering-McHenry Correspondence. Pittsburgh, 1960. description ends , 517–18.

8Meade’s wife was Mary Grymes Randolph Meade.

A widow of William Randolph, Mary Grymes (1753–1813) married Meade in December 1780. She was his second wife. The couple had eight children together.

Index Entries