John Jay Papers

The Preliminary Articles Are Signed  Editorial Note

The Preliminary Articles Are Signed

On 25 November Oswald presented the American commissioners with the treaty as revised by the British cabinet. This initiated the final round of discussions that produced the preliminary treaty.1 Once it appeared certain that the process was about to be concluded, the British government prorogued Parliament until 5 December “to give time”, as Thomas Townshend explained, “to receive a final answer from the Powers with whom we are in Negotiation.”2 Fearing that this action might be misunderstood in France, Grantham directed Alleyne Fitzherbert to explain the decision to Vergennes.3 Shelburne assumed that the American commissioners would “consider the Step . . . taken in regard to Parliament, . . . in it’s due Light.”4

The two issues that were not resolved until the very end were the New-foundland fisheries and compensation for Loyalists. Townshend instructed Oswald to make sure that any concession on the fisheries did not interfere with the king’s rights or with privileges granted to the French.5 In a letter written the following day, Shelburne explained to Oswald that England’s attitude about both the fisheries and the Loyalists was prompted by a sincere desire to avoid future “dissention.”6 The American intransigence on the Loyalist refugee issue sorely troubled Vergennes, who feared that it would prolong the war.7 In a letter of 26 November Franklin told Oswald that it was best to drop all mention of the refugees unless the British were willing to compensate Americans’ losses.8

On 29 November the negotiators, joined by Henry Laurens, who had just arrived from London, spent the entire day trying to reach an agreement. At day’s end, Fitzherbert and Strachey authorized Oswald to accept the American terms. Franklin assumed responsibility for informing Vergennes that negotiations had been successfully concluded.9 The next day the commissioners met to review the fair copies of their agreement and made minor modifications. Once the treaties were signed, sealed, and delivered, the Americans dined together at Passy. Jay commented on their perfect harmony. “Mr. Adams was particularly useful respecting the eastern boundary,” he wrote, “and Dr. Franklin’s firmness and exertions on the subject of the Tories did us much service.”10

By the evening of 30 November the treaty was on its way by courier to Britain. Strachey planned to set off for London the next day—if he were still alive. “God forbid,” he wrote, “I should ever have a hand in another Peace.” Like his companions, he was anxious about how the treaty would be received. “Now are We to be hanged, or applauded for thus rescuing you from the American War?” he wrote. “I am half dead with perpetual anxiety, and shall not be at ease till I see how the great Men receive me— If this is not as good a Peace as was expected, I am confident it is the best that could have been made.” The articles were not, Oswald commented to Townshend, “exactly what were proposed by the Draft which Mr. Strachey brought over with him, but are the best we could possibly obtain of them.”

Fitzherbert confessed “great pain” at having to agree to unattractive but inevitable peace conditions. Both he and Oswald praised Strachey for his “indefatigable” efforts to obtain the best treaty possible. Although Strachey noted with relief after his arrival in London on 10 December that the treaty was generally approved, he also mentioned displeasure over the articles governing Loyalists and the fisheries. In very short order this displeasure overwhelmed the approval and brought down Shelburne’s government.11

The treaty became effective on 20 January 1783, when the European preliminaries were signed. News of the settlement did not reach Congress until 12 March 1783. While most applauded the commissioners for the concessions won from Britain, some criticized the separate article and the decision to negotiate without the involvement of France.12

Informal discussions among the American commissioners about modifications to the preliminary treaty and for a trade agreement to replace the commercial reciprocity provisions that had been stripped from the first draft of the preliminaries began almost immediately. The Shelburne administration was increasingly paralyzed by opposition criticism of the pact. Formal trade and treaty negotiations resumed in April 1783 under the Fox-North coalition. After several months of discussion, the present document, virtually unchanged except for a prologue, was adopted as the definitive treaty in September 1783. It did not eliminate all “Seeds of Discord” or secure “perpetual Peace and Harmony” between the two nations. A decade later, Jay would play a major role in resolving many of the difficulties left outstanding.13

1See Henry Strachey’s Remarks to the American Peace Commissioners, 25 Nov. 1782, above; and, for a description of the negotiations that followed, see Adams, Diary description begins Lyman H. Butterfield et al., eds., Diary and Autobiography of John Adams (4 vols.; Cambridge, Mass., 1961) description ends , 3: 72–85.

2The search for equivalents to compensate for British cession of Gibraltar to Spain was still under way. Issues involving the fisheries, Africa, and the East and West Indies were also still under discussion. See Townshend to Oswald, 22 Nov. 1782, Dft and C, UkLR: FO 27/ 2; LbkC, FO 95/ 157.

3See Grantham to Fitzherbert, 23 Nov. 1782, LbkC, UkLPR: FO 27/ 3.

4Shelburne to Oswald, 23 Nov. 1782, in Giunta, Emerging Nation description begins Mary A. Giunta et al., eds., The Emerging Nation: A Documentary History of the Foreign Relations of the United States under the Articles of Confederation, 1780–1789 (3 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1996) description ends , 1: 682.

5Townshend to Oswald, 22 Nov. 1782, cited in note 2, above.

6Shelburne was deeply concerned that concessions on the fisheries and Loyalists might be seen as reducing Britain to “Terms of Humiliation”, and expressed his belief that if ministers agreed to them through “Timidity or Indolence”, the “Nation would rise to do itself Justice, & to recover it’s wounded Honor.” See his letter to Oswald of 23 Nov., cited in note 4 above.

7For his comments on all key issues still undecided between Britain and the United States, and on his attitudes toward the American peace commissioners, see Vergennes to La Luzerne, 23 Nov. 1782, in Giunta, Emerging Nation description begins Mary A. Giunta et al., eds., The Emerging Nation: A Documentary History of the Foreign Relations of the United States under the Articles of Confederation, 1780–1789 (3 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1996) description ends , 1: 683–85.

8See BF’s letter demanding compensation for the removal or destruction of American property, including slaves, and the alternate fifth article he proposed on 29 Nov. to pressure the British negotiators to drop their demands for guaranteed compensation for the Loyalists, and Oswald’s description of the impact of BF’s article, PBF description begins William B. Willcox et al., eds., The Papers of Benjamin Franklin (40 vols. to date; New Haven, Conn., 1959–) description ends , 38: 350–56, 375–77; and Giunta, Emerging Nation description begins Mary A. Giunta et al., eds., The Emerging Nation: A Documentary History of the Foreign Relations of the United States under the Articles of Confederation, 1780–1789 (3 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1996) description ends , 1: 696. On implementation of the British decision to evacuate all slaves who had served with British forces during the war or who feared reprisals if returned to their masters, see Gary Nash, The Unknown American Revolution: The Unruly Birth of Democracy and the Struggle to Create America (New York, 2005), 402–7.

9For the French reaction, see “Vergennes’s Response to News of the Preliminaries” (editorial note) on pp. 281–82.

10See JJ to the Secretary for Foreign Affairs, 12 Dec. 1782, below; Adams, Diary description begins Lyman H. Butterfield et al., eds., Diary and Autobiography of John Adams (4 vols.; Cambridge, Mass., 1961) description ends , 3: 79–85; PBF description begins William B. Willcox et al., eds., The Papers of Benjamin Franklin (40 vols. to date; New Haven, Conn., 1959–) description ends , 38: 412–13; and Peacemakers description begins Richard B. Morris, The Peacemakers: The Great Powers and American Independence (New York, 1965) description ends , 372–82.

11Strachey to Evan Nepean, 29 Nov., Fitzherbert to Townshend, 30 Nov., and Strachey to Fitzherbert, 10 Dec. 1782, in Giunta, Emerging Nation description begins Mary A. Giunta et al., eds., The Emerging Nation: A Documentary History of the Foreign Relations of the United States under the Articles of Confederation, 1780–1789 (3 vols.; Washington, D.C., 1996) description ends , 1: 689–90, 694–95, 712–13; Oswald to Shelburne, 30 Nov., ALS, MiU-C: Sherburne 71; Strachey to Nepean, 30 Nov. 1782, ALS, UkLPR: CO 5/ 8–3. On the fall of the Shelburne government, see JJ to Benjamin Vaughan, 28 Mar. 1783, below.

12On the signing of the European preliminaries, see “Passports and the Cessation of Hostilities” (editorial note) on pp. 313–16. On the American reaction, see the Secretary for Foreign Affairs to the American Peace Commissioners, 4 Jan. and 25 Mar. 1783, and “Tensions between Allies over the Peace Negotiations” and “Congress Debates the Commissioners’ Conduct” (editorial notes) on pp. 300–302, 334–40. For the commissioners’ response to criticism, see American Peace Commissioners to the Secretary for Foreign Affairs, 18 July 1783, below.

13On negotiations for a trade agreement, see “Negotiating a Trade Agreement” (editorial note) on pp. 373–86, and the Draft Treaty of Commerce with Great Britain, 1 June 1783. For modifications to the preliminary treaty suggested by both sides, see “Signing the Definitive Treaty” (editorial note), on pp. 462–67.

Index Entries